Abstract
The theory of field-oriented control of induction motors, which emerged in the early 2000s, is based on a fundamental property of field orientation, which involves decomposing the motor’s output into two independent subsystems: electromechanical and electromagnetic. The first ensures control of the mechanical coordinates, while the second controls the rotor (stator) flux for field-oriented control and the determination of its module. Such a decomposition is de facto standard for both indirect and direct field-oriented control, since the control algorithm in this case is the simplest and also transparent from the perspective of the physics of an electric machine’s operation. At the same time, the mechanism for forming the decomposition involves compensating for the internal feedback loops of the asynchronous motor model, which negatively affects the robustness properties of the control system against parametric and coordinate disturbances. An alternative approach is being considered in the field of energy, based on the fact that the electrical part of an asynchronous machine is intrinsically asymptotically stable that is, passive and therefore has a Lyapunov function, which is used to prove its stability. Taking this property into account, an engineering-friendly method is presented for synthesizing a vector control system for the torque and flux linkage vector of an asynchronous motor based on the second Lyapunov method, which forms an alternative decomposition in the form of a mechanical-electrical subsystem. Two new forms of Lyapunov functions have been found for designing field oriented control system the rotor and stator flux vectors. The synthesized control systems ensure asymptotic tracking of the specified trajectories of torque and flux vector magnitude, and have a physically well-founded structure since they preserve the structure of the asynchronous motor model.
References
1. Blaschke F. Das verfahren der feldorientierung zur regelung der asynchron maschine. Siemens Forschungs. Ektwicklungs. Vol. 1. No. 1. Pp. 184–193. 1972.
2. Hasse K. Zum dynamischen verhalten der asynchron maschine bei betrieb mit variabler stander-frequenz und standerspannung. Electrotechniche Zeitung ETZ. A89. Pp. 77–81. 1968.
3. Leonhard W. Control of Electrical Drives. (3rd edition). Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2001. 460 p.
4. Krstic M. Kanellakopoulos I. and Kokotovic P. Nonlinear and Adaptive Control Design. New York: Whiley, 1995. 576 p.
5. Sepulchre R., Jankovic M. and Kokotovic P. Constructive Nonlinear Control. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1997. 313 p.
6. Peresada S., Tonielli A. and Morici R. High performance indirect field-oriented output feedback control of induction motors. Automatica. Vol. 35. Pp. 1033–1047. 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-1098(99)00003-5.
7. Peresada, S. and Tonielli, A. (2000), High-performance robust speed-flux tracking controller for induction motor. Int. J. Adapt. Control Signal Process., 14: 177-200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1115(200003/05)14:2/3<177::AID-ACS579>3.0.CO;2-2
8. Marino R., Tomei P., Verrelli C.M. Induction motor control design. Springer, 2010. 351 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-284-1.
9. Ortega R., Loria A., Nicklasson P. and Sira-Ramirez H. Passivity-based control of Euler-Lagrange systems. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1998. 543 p.
10. Nicklasson P. J., Ortega R., Espinosa-Perez G., Jacobi C. G. J. Passivity-based control of a class of Blondel-Park transformable electric machines. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Vol. 42, No. 5. Pp. 629-647. 1997. DOI: 10.1109/9.580867.
11. Travieso-Torres J. C., Ricaldi-Morales A. J., Aguila-Camacho N. Robust Combined Adaptive Passivity-Based Control for Induction Motors. Machines, 12(4). 272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/machines12040272.
12. Bozhko S., Dymko S., Kovbasa S., Peresada S. M. Maximum Torque-per-Amp Control for Traction IM Drives: Theory and Experimental Results. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications. Vol. 53. No. 1. Pp. 181-193. Jan.-Feb. 2017. DOI: 10.1109/TIA.2016.2608789.
13. O. Gulbudak, M. Gokdag and H. Komurcugil. Model Predictive Control Strategy for Induction Motor Drive Using Lyapunov Stability Objective. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics. Vol. 69. No. 12. Pp. 12119-12128. Dec. 2022, DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2021.3139237.
14. Пересада, С., Ковбаса, С., Щербаченко, В., Ніконенко, Є., Подейко, П. Керування моментом синхронних реактивних двигунів з оптимізацією за критерієм момент-струм. Технічна електродинаміка. 2025. No. 2, 041. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/techned2022.05.045
15. Ortega R., Guadalupe J.R., Borja P., Donaire A. Use of Passivity for Analysis and Tuning of PIDs: Two Practical Examples in PID Passivity-Based Control of Nonlinear Systems with Applications. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics. 2021. Pp.15-45. DOI: 10.1002/9781119694199.ch3.
16. Abu-Rub H., Iqbal A., Guzinski J. High performance control of AC drives with MatLab/Simulink. IEEE Press: John Wiley and Sons, 2021. 482 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119969242
17. Peresada, S. M., Kovbasa, S. M., Statsenko, O. V., Serhiienko, O. V. Direct speed-flux vector control of induction motors: controller design and experimental robustness evaluation. Applied Aspects of Information Technology. 2022. Vol. 5. No 3. Pp. 217-227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15276/aait.05.2022.15.
18. Accetta A., Alonge F., Cirrincione M., D’Ippolito F., Pucci M., Rabbeni R., Sferlazza A. Robust control for high performance induction motor drives based on partial state-feedback linearization. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications. 2019. Vol. 55. No 1. Pp. 490–503. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TIA.2018.2869112.
19. Peresada S.M., Kovbasa S.M., Krasnoshapka N.D. Indirect vector control of induction motors with robustness and adaptation properties to active rotor resistance variations: monograph. Kyiv: Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute, 2020. 174 p. URL: https://ela.kpi.ua/handle/123456789/44255. (Ukr)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 С.М. Пересада, С.О. Строєвий, В.В. Щербаченко
